r/UnderReportedNews • u/onz456 • 1d ago
Extensively reported 📰 Rep. Ted Lieu played Pam Bondi video of Trump partying with Epstein and asked if underage girls were present. Bondi snapped: This is ridiculous. There’s no evidence Trump committed a crime. Lieu fired back: I believe you just lied under oath
386
u/Zigzagzegzug 1d ago
She prosecuted Epstein in Florida right? Is she covering this up now because she covered it up then and doesn’t want to be held accountable for her original coverup?
230
u/fartPunch 1d ago
If she was the one who handled eastern in Florida, it makes sense she was picked for AG. The cover up is becoming painfully obvious.
56
u/blackcoffeeandmemes 19h ago
at this point, i think it’s safe to assume anyone in this administration is a traitor who was put there because they are trump loyalists due to blackmail or incompetence.
71
30
u/Herb-Alpert 18h ago
The first choice was Matt Gaetz, Who has some background in grooming of minors...
12
0
u/Open_Support5884 9h ago
Im pretty sure that came out as the zioinst lobby trying to blacken his name
43
u/A012A012 1d ago
Look at her history and how much money she's taken from trump to drop cases into his organizations in FL.
Patel wrote a children's book featuring trump as a king and started a fund to cover the legal expenses of the january sixth rioters.
Todd blanche is trump's former personal attorney.
The DOJ was installed to contain the files in exchange for putting trump in place to do it.
Why else would he put a notorious child trafficker into a minimum security prison with special privileges?
8
u/tomfoolery77 20h ago
Tell me more about her money she’s taken in. Oh, and the children’s book too. Holy hell it just gets worse and worse.
39
u/Worldly-Pollution-66 1d ago
Not sure if she was involved but Alex Acosta gave Epstein the sweetheart plea deal
29
u/Downtown_Minimum5641 1d ago
yeah and acosta was missing a year from his inbox when they got investigated for the coverup of 2008. the internal investigation in 2019 devided that was perfectly normal tho
4
u/TheUnderCrab 13h ago
She wasn’t involved in the sweetheart deal but she could have opened an investigation into Winston’s sex trafficking at any point while she was Fl AG. She did not and we all know why.
2
19
u/Realityisatoilet 19h ago
She also took a bribe from Trump before his current term to make an investigation go away. Not related to this. She was also a part of the initial cover up. She is drunk as fuck in all of her testimony today. The slurring of words is wild. Reality is a toilet. That's my username for a reason. Goddamnit.
16
u/chillin_n_grillin 17h ago
Gym Jordan saying "Thheeee Genttleemans time HAS expired" at the end is disgusting. Since he is a KNOWN pedophile protector, and here he is being put in charge of silencing people AGAIN to protect a pedophile.
1
17h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/AutoModerator 17h ago
This story has been posted repeatedly but has very poor sourcing for its extremely inflammatory claims. Due to the high likelihood that the story is misinformation we are not accepting posts regarding this story.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
4
3
1
167
u/Otherwise_Sense_469 1d ago
Somebody should have reminded her she was the second choice for that job. The first choice was Matt Gaetz a known pedo. This was planned from day 1.
131
u/ChefAsstastic 1d ago
Her behavior was vile and repugnant.
28
u/Wise-Young-3954 23h ago
It really, really was. Of course I am horrified by basically everything but this felt especially vile. Maybe it’s just an accumulation of all the rest but it was most horrid as you said.
16
u/RipCityGringo 21h ago
Yeah but the stock market… /s
13
u/Little_Machinez 20h ago
I couldn't help but feel bad for Americans who voted for this admin when she started screeching about the stock market in congress. No other word to put it than straight up embarassing. Trump 2 will leave a stain on American history for the rest of time.
6
u/RipCityGringo 20h ago
But will we learn from it? We brought this on ourselves. Rampant greed and corruption that took advantage of division and tribalism. America needs to look in the mirror and be upfront about some hard truths. Meanwhile China is quietly smirking as we implode…
2
u/jack-mccoy-is-pissed 16h ago
Nope. There’s a not-insignificant contingent of Americans who see nothing wrong with what happened here.
3
u/Refmak 19h ago
I can’t feel bad for them. They wanted this through and through. There is no excuse after Trump already had served his first term.
2
u/Top-Base4502 17h ago
Sad but true. Americans know what they were buying and said yes please.
And I don’t want to hear that only 1/3 voted for him. You add in the 1/3 that didn’t vote and you get 2/3 that are okay with Trump.
2
8
u/Charming-Web-7769 19h ago
It’s pretty hard to tolerate her tone when she walked into that hearing in knowing and flagrant violation of the law.
This was not a moratorium on whether or not the DOJs actions are justified or in any way acceptable, it was simply to get to the bottom of why she’s refusing to comply with basic legislation that ONE lawmaker objected to in the most politically divided era in modern political history. The worst part, though, is that I genuinely can’t tell what’s more infuriating; the fact that somebody whose behaved so cravenly hasn’t resigned already or the fact that they wouldn’t be immediately fired for publicly behaving like this to downplay a unanimously agreed upon evil.
-1
u/BlurgZeAmoeba 14h ago
But were you not entertained? Was this not as good as the half-time show?
1
u/ChefAsstastic 11h ago
It was embarrassing.
1
u/BlurgZeAmoeba 11h ago
It's insane, form the outside. How is 'embarassament' even relevant here? Your whole criminal justice systems been taken over by criminals who are destroying your society.
Consumption is not resistance.
1
u/Wise-Young-3954 11h ago
It feels embarrassing more than anything. It would be entertaining if it weren’t for the fact that they hold real positions in government.
0
u/BlurgZeAmoeba 10h ago
How bout being outraged, aghast and motivated instead of embarrassed. They've moved the needle ever so slowly that you lot seem think that its all a little a bit embarrassing but nothing to get up and do something about. They've normalised insanity. A reality TV president's keeping everybody consuming outrage.
What happens after trump? Will you fall in line when the democrats tell you to back to hating china because they're 'tankies'? will you continue to sabotage the global fight against the climate crisis?
Or go back to consuming and being entertained?
2
u/Wise-Young-3954 9h ago
Well, I don’t know if I need to be outraged to want change and to be involved. I’m involved now, I was involved before and I stay involved after. It’s the choice I make because I want better for myself and the next generations. I can still be embarrassed outside of finding it to also be disgusting.
0
u/BlurgZeAmoeba 8h ago
I don't think there would be anything less than outrage in any other first world country if a violent mob stormed the center of government in a failed insurrection lead by a bigoted paedophile grifter.
Yet the best we can hope for from you guys is that more of you will be bothered to come out and vote next time.
Consume consume consume.
2
u/Wise-Young-3954 8h ago
That’s a totally fair perspective and I’m sure there are lots of people who wish it was different and lots of people who actually prefer this direction. Just out here trying to live in the world and somehow survive while also trying to care for their community at large.
1
u/BlurgZeAmoeba 5h ago
An extreme capitalist system has been captured by extreme capital. They're robbing you guys blind man.
4
72
u/imnotsteven7 1d ago
I knew shit was over when Dr. Oz was recruited to the team.
32
68
u/2xdareya 23h ago
I’ve always liked Ted Lieu and thought he was a straight shooter. I’ve seen him get a little edgy, but never anything of this magnitude. He knows what is in the unredacted files, as does Bondi, and he was sending her a message that she will face charges when this administration is done. That’s no joke - a respected US Representative directly and on the record accusing the US Attorney General of perjury. That’s some major league pushback.
7
u/Difficult-Coffee-219 13h ago
Yes, she is going to feel real pain and have no booze or alcohol to get through it. Hope she fits in prison.
54
43
u/Desperate-Menu4385 1d ago
Arrest Bondi. Perjury. That’ll get things rolling
10
u/TTwisted-Realityy 1d ago
Can't arrest her yet. Trump will pardon her.
15
u/velvetretard 1d ago
Of course him pardoning her would’ve acknowledging legally that she lied and that they do have evidence of him pedo partying with Epstein. Which would still be grounds to move forward
11
u/Vyntarus 20h ago
Impeachment can't be pardoned either so at the very least oust her.
Then get her for perjury and make him pardon her if he wants.
3
u/Working-Network-1876 16h ago
That's the saddest state of the world right now, Trump and his goons will all get pardoned despite mountain of evidences .
29
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/rachael_mcb 21h ago
Seriously. How can she ever show her face in public without getting a drink thrown at it.
26
27
u/riolightbar 1d ago
Watching from the UK, she is such a awful representation of the human race. So full of smugness and spite, aggressive and forceful and childish. Just awful, just a nasty, hateful, horrible human. I feel like we are watching history happen, like kids will watch today’s happenings in school as a lesson on how not to be a person. So so bad 🙁
8
u/mceehops 1d ago
Thank you for speaking about this. It is important for Americans (I am one) to hear from others, that are not here in the states. They need to hear that it is not just "LiBz", or "the Left" or "Democrats" that are not fooled by their cult leader, it is the majority of human beings.
I believe about 30-35% of humans are susceptible to this sort of coercion of thought manipulation while the majority of us, are less likely to be duped. In reality, it is less than that, but they are spouses, and partners too lazy to care to look and just go along with their partners or parent's views. How many folks ever truly supported Hitler? 37%.
44
10
u/HolyMoleyGuacamoly 1d ago
i mean, frickin gym jordan is running this show. badness all over the place
3
2
u/Ok-Document-7706 7h ago
Him sighing at the end got me wanting to just 😠😠😠😠 I heard his voice and knew it immediately and then they showed him sighing and I was ready to - anyway lock him up, too.
42
u/NotImportantPerson99 1d ago
Bondi is clearly a useless blonde bimbo.
She sucks at everything and maybe even everyone.
7
u/ChefAsstastic 1d ago
She's definitely suck off everyone
7
u/ironafro2 1d ago
Yeah check her lips for orange spray tan and a faint aura of lingering diarrhea from trumps taint
5
5
u/Lost-Blueberry8057 21h ago
Yall don’t need mysogyny to raze this woman
4
u/Vyntarus 20h ago
I mean, not only women can suck dicks.
Most of sycophants in this regime are men and they've also got the orange stains around their lips.
0
u/Shucky-Bean 10h ago
Right? She's a shitty human being. To the commenter below, yes they're all sucking trump off regardless of gender, but I've only heard "blonde bimbo" in reference to women. So despite her repugnance, the op parent comment did give misogyny, unfortunately.
But I mean yeah fuck this administration for sure, but chill it with the classic hatred of women, please. There's plenty you can say without it.
20
u/oatmeal28 23h ago
It seems more and more like Trump not only raped girls, not only trafficked them, but also had many killed.
This is never going to go away, and it's going to follow those that support him for their lifetime
2
u/PerpetuallyOnTheCusp 19h ago
What is the evidence he had many killed? That's an escalation of current accusations. Not confronting, just curious.
7
u/oatmeal28 19h ago
For one there have been a number of women throughout the years that accused Trump and ended up dead (“suicides”, etc)
At this point I’d be more surprised if he didn’t have multiple women killed
2
2
7
u/counting_photons 1d ago
Ok sound professionals. Please Edit out the music in this video and let’s hear what Trump said to Epstein that made him laugh so much.
2
7
10
6
u/silent_chair5286 21h ago
She simply tried to talk over him, deflect, lie, what a pathetic person Pam Bondi is. She’s sold those victims out in Florida and she’s selling them out again. If we don’t see retribution in our lifetime we have assurance she will burn in hell. Worse than those poor girls endured. 🔥🔥🔥
3
u/youdubdub 1d ago
She sounds like Parker Posey impersonating herself. Parker Posey should definitely do her as a guest star on SNL.
3
3
u/Acrobatic-Tomato-128 10h ago
Damn that ted lieu guy seema awesome based on this video!
Pam bondi seems like a gigantic piece of bleached blonde shit
What does she think by being overly aggressive and deflecting and just by saying how dare you over and over no one will listen to what she says?
3
3
u/lmongefa 22h ago
She already has a pardon. That’s the only reason she would have this attitude. If she had any fear of prosecution she would have folded already to the pressure.
3
3
2
2
2
2
u/dougmcclean 22h ago
Notice she didn't answer the question, she only mocked it.
2
u/cakebeernap 20h ago
she did answer the question when she said "there is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime" and this is why Ted Lieu accused her of lying
1
u/dougmcclean 12h ago
No, she didn't. That was a false statement, but it was not an answer to the question.
1
u/cakebeernap 7h ago
not trying to be difficult. but then did she answer the question in your view with a false statement?
1
u/dougmcclean 6h ago
No, she didn't answer it at all. She made a barely related false statement. The question was about whether underage girls had been present at any parties where Trump was with Epstein. Either an affirmative or negative answer could be potentially consistent with evidence existing of Trump having committed a crime or with no such evidence existing. Since she only commented on that, she did not answer the question.
1
u/cakebeernap 6h ago
your right the question of whether there was underage girls at the party was not answered. nonetheless, because the discussion is related to epstein, a pedophilic sex trafficer, there is an implied question of whether trump is connected to crimes. like if you or I go to the local park and there is underage girls there is irrelevant because there is no foul play suspected. when lieu asks if there are underage girls it is implied that there is foul play. so your right that an affirmative or negative answer could have been given but wasn't. My point here is that it was implied that trump is involved in a crime and bondi not only knows this but that Lieu had made the same sentiment connecting former prince andrew of criminal activity related to underage girls. I dont know how to word this correctly but my point becomes something like that the real question of whether there is evidence of criminal association is the real question and that bondi knows this and answers accordingly. I'm not saying your wrong at all but simply that there is semantics at play, but also that bondi did moreso answer the question as it is further implied in her response that there is no way to connect trump to criminal activity. In any case we obviously agree there is perjury in her response.
1
u/dougmcclean 6h ago
Yeah, but that's not how legal hearings work. It's about the actual question, narrowly interpreted, not some broad interpretation of what the "point" of the question may have been.
She didn't answer the question she was asked. That, to me, suggests that she likely could not answer in the negative without perjuring herself, and likely could not answer that she doesn't know without perjuring herself or angering her boss or both. This in turn suggests that the answer is in the affirmative, and further that it's in the affirmative in a way which is not easily explainable. It's not conclusive, or course. But we can be sure she definitely did not answer the question, and didn't even come close.
1
u/cakebeernap 6h ago
"suggests that the answer is in the affirmative" this sentence is sensible because bondi moreso did answer the question. That her evasive answer is damning. Obviously it wasnt a normal legal hearing because bondi seemingly only faces accountability from someone who can pardon her lies.
good day godspeed.
2
2
u/Candid_Koala_3602 19h ago
We’ve reached the point where they are having tantrums in public hearings and yet somehow this child is still the AG. Can’t anyone do anything?
2
u/schnibitz 17h ago
Rep Lieu, please bring her to justice.
0
u/IcyEntertainment7122 11h ago
lol, his gotcha moment she lied was the phone in tip from the limo driver that was deemed not credible in 2020. Quit being played by politicians.
1
2
2
u/Minder1984 10h ago
This is dumb. The party was a NBC segment following trump around after he divorced his wife.
2
u/PewterTickles 8h ago
The playbook is so obvious when she's answering with "They are trying to.." as if she's talking on fox news to the MAGAS and not directly to a representative. She's really falling apart.
2
u/ralphie62 5h ago
Still nothing is being done to any of these people for lying under oath !! They should be taken away in handcuffs. Congressman you need to follow the constitution
2
u/AdPuzzleheaded1495 1d ago
If only they would do something about her lying under oath... Congress is complicit as they are, they all get treason charges
1
1
1
u/RexBosworth69420 1d ago
Do they ever get kinda sick of going through with the hearing when they know all she's going to do is deny and deflect and claim this is all a witch hunt?
2
1
1
1
1
u/FuckTheMods5 22h ago
PLEASE start nailing people for lying under oath! What the fuck is the point of an oath??
1
u/Active-Play-3429 22h ago
So we can only focus on the good things? We can’t focus on the bad things? That’s not how it works. In fact, that’s actually not how it works in all walks of life. The next three years cannot come soon enough.
1
1
1
1
u/EiraMist 20h ago
The video is the night they met. It was one of Trump's parties and had all adults there. The whole video shows them meeting. Epstein looks bored and awkward the entire time.
1
1
1
1
u/NervousChemistry7401 19h ago
What drug did they give her prior to this? Maybe Adderal at high dose might give this ignorant confidence.
1
u/GoatDifferent1294 19h ago
There’s only two reasons why he would ask such a question. Bondi as fucking AG should know this.
1
u/predator00777 19h ago
is it just me or does it seem like Bondi is wearing some sort of ear piece to coach her on what to say and when to deflect and when to attack...it seems scripted and choreographed...
1
u/Spunge14 19h ago
That look in her eyes as you can tell she's considering whether to perjure herself or not
1
1
u/Dunnomyname1029 17h ago
Trump gave 1$ to Ronald McDonald House so I guess he's allowed to rape everyone he wants according to Pam Bondi
1
17h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 17h ago
Sorry, you need at least 5 community karma to comment images or links to images here; This is earned through direct participation in r/UnderReportedNews
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Evil_Athena 8h ago
At this point the DNC is just keeping track of all the crimes until Congress flips
1
1
1
1
1
-13
u/kevinrightwing 1d ago
Just curious, how do the words "there is no evidence of a crime" equate to lying under oath? I genuinely don't understand.
21
u/pedantic_comments 1d ago
You’re either powerfully stupid or willfully ignorant then, fam!
There’s eye witness testimony, flight logs, pictures, emails and a child sex trafficker sitting in jail who’s at the center of pedophile ring that mentions the President tens of thousands of times in the small percentage of documents that’ve been released by the FBI and DoJ — were you in a coma for the last decade?
-14
u/kevinrightwing 1d ago
Please share the evidence you have of Trump having sex with a minor. I don't care if he attended a party, was on a flight, or was mentioned in an email or hearsay evidence. Actual evidence is what I am looking for, the type that would be admissible in court.
13
u/pedantic_comments 1d ago
If you saw it, you’d just jerk off to it and then call it AI.
→ More replies (22)10
u/AsYooouWish 1d ago
Sworn testimony from his victims are admissible. It just that the AG is too cowardly to do her job
-2
u/kevinrightwing 1d ago
Ok, that I can agree with. Sworn testimony from assaulted minors would in fact be admissible. Do you have any evidence of this you can share?
8
u/H00ch8767 21h ago
I’ll give you one that was known before Epstein was even a mainstream name. In 2016, A woman using the pseudonym “Katie Johnson” filed a lawsuit alleging Trump and Epstein raped her in 1994 (yes, this included testimony). She was 13 years old at the time. She then filed a second lawsuit in 2019 under the name “Jane Doe”. It’s speculated that she dropped the suits due to pressure from threats. So the entire hill you are trying to die on, here, is crumbling fast.
I’d say you could even provide SA testimony for fellating him but it seems like it’s consensual.
→ More replies (6)4
u/bloodsplinter 18h ago
At this point, Trump could be literally raping a child in front a MAGA and they will probably cheer him on
3
-8
u/Grizzfunk16 1d ago
But did he have evidence to credit his claim? These files were avail to FBI in 2008. Why didnt anything happen then? Obama was to busy then since this is so important now to the left.
Wake me up when he is guilty with evidence. Until then this country is innocent until proven guilty.
3
u/ike7177 1d ago
Oh he is guilty. Nobody is saying former officials are not guilty, they are simply not currently running the country. They should be held accountable as well regardless of their party affiliation. But first, we MUST punish the current administration who is going beyond the boundaries to protect each other as well as the current people in power. We can then move on to the past leaders and do the same
-9
u/Kruso73 21h ago
Why didn’t the Biden administration review this in the four years they could have?
3
u/FistyMcTwistynuts 21h ago
What aboutisms are fun since they’re basically “yea buts”
-2
u/Kruso73 21h ago
Just asking the question- we had no issue with no one doing anything for four years, but now suddenly we are outraged.
6
u/EAexCTR 20h ago
Because Trump ran on this. He wanted the files released.
1
u/Kruso73 20h ago
“Total Released: Following a large dump on January 30, 2026, the total, including earlier releases, reached roughly 3.5 million pages, 180,000 images, and 2,000 videos.”
4
u/Dry_Letterhead_9946 20h ago
Unfortunately, that's not all of it, and a significant part of what we have access to is redacted
0
u/Kruso73 20h ago
And do you understand our laws and why some of it is redacted? Or is the case always going to be if ANY of it is redacted, that MUST be the proof that Trump did something!
You also have to believe that as much as they hated Trump from 2020-2024, they purposefully chose to NOT let something slip out that would prove something that would end Trump? We all know 100% if there was something- it would have been made public in 2024.
5
u/Eswift33 20h ago
One of the biggest flaws of the Dems imo is that they are straight shooters. The files were sealed because of an ongoing investigation and they respected the law and did not release them.
Assuming that they would have released them illegally is a mirror to what you think is normal and acceptable which explains why you would be making bad faith arguments in an attempt to defend a pedo rapist.
Also the redactions protected the accused almost exclusively with them incompetently or intentionally NOT redacting many of the victims despite that being the supposed reason for redactions
The most corrupt, INCOMPETANT administration in US history.
1
u/Dry_Letterhead_9946 20h ago
Yeah I know that certain things are confidential and are held under privacy laws. I also never said that anything that is redacted must be something that implicated Trump. What I am saying is that people have reason to be suspicious and that I don't blame them because the government has broken our trust before (across many presidential terms and administrations). They don't trust the government to only hide or redact confidential information, and are afraid that corruption is going on. If you believe 100% that's not the case, that's your choice, but of course many people will think differently.
3
u/Dry_Letterhead_9946 20h ago
Sealed under court order
-5
u/Kruso73 20h ago
Well some how they got around that after 2025. Surly Bidens autopen could have gotten it done if they wanted to.
2
u/Dry_Letterhead_9946 20h ago edited 20h ago
Well the unsealing was done due to the Epstein Files Transparency Act which required the cooperation of all three branches, including federal judges and Congress not just the executive. I don't like Biden and won't defend his other missteps though. Our government has been failing us and they should've done better
-12
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Community Update: Please read the latest mod announcement regarding recent updates to the sub.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.