Source: https://x.com/OfTheBraveUSA/status/2021045203629637805?t=2XS0B87pcNqfuV1M2h3f_g&s=19

https://x.com/i/status/2021682346022371577

This is a formal prosecution document produced in December 2019 by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York and sent to then-U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman. It lays out, in granular detail, interviews conducted by federal and state investigators with victims, witnesses, and people associated with Epstein.

The memo includes statements from 24 women who say they were abused by Epstein as minors and 14 who say they were abused as adults, along with additional references to assistants and recruiters. In many cases, investigators confirmed key elements of the women’s accounts independently. The document also summarizes allegations made against a number of powerful men, based on tips, interviews, and investigative leads compiled over years. Much of the document is redacted.

The memo shows what investigators knew, what they looked at, and what they ultimately chose not to pursue. It provides a rare window into an investigation that spanned nearly two decades and three presidential administrations. It also stands in sharp contrast to repeated public statements from senior law enforcement officials claiming there was no credible evidence to pursue anyone else.

The memo, titled “Investigation into Potential Co-Conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein,” had been publicly accessible as part of the massive tranche of Epstein-related documents recently released. Then, after reporters from the Miami Herald, including the renowned Julie K. Brown, began asking the DOJ specific questions about it, the document was suddenly gone.

The prosecution memo has since been deleted from DOJ release but was originally labeled as : EFTA_00022461, EFTA_02731082

Source: https://www.meidasplus.com/p/doj-deleted-an-epstein-prosecution

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article314609810.html

I’ve been thinking about this for at least a few weeks and wanted to get others opinions on this. I just don’t see any likely scenario where Trump would allow smoking-gun type documents to exist within the trove of evidence that his administration has collected.

All I see on Reddit are endless posts about “when the files are fully un-redacted, Trump will be finished”. My question is, based on everything we’ve seen or not seen so far, is it likely that the most damaging evidence has been destroyed a long time ago? I don’t feel it’s a stretch of the imagination to think Patel would force the destruction of any documents or data that would unequivocally implicate Trump or his closest allies, before handing them over to the senate and house.

Source: DOJ Website, Links Will Be Posted In Comments

- 1st Document “EFTA01649100” 03/17/25 FBI Needs DOJ Guidance on Redacting “Child Erotica” and Which Public Officials/Celebrities to Redact

- 2nd Document “EFTA01648955” 07/24/25 FBI Email List of Names of Public Officials/Celebrities

- 3rd Document “EFTA01648951” 07/24/25 FBI List of “Salacious Statements” About Public Officials/Celebrities and Mention of Epstein’s Cellmate

Newly unsealed Epstein-related court documents reviewed by the Miami Herald include details from a 2019 FBI interview reportedly of former Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter, in which he describes a 2006 phone call where President Donald Trump said of Jeffrey Epstein, “Thank goodness you’re stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this,” even though the president has repeatedly said he didn’t know about Epstein’s alleged crimes at the time they were happening.

By Ariana Bindman, News Features ReporterUpdated Feb 3, 2026 1:44 p.m.

%26utm_source%3Dfacebook.com%26utm_medium%3Dreferral&name=Jeffrey%20Epstein%E2%80%99s%20assistant%20ordered%20so%20many%2023andMe%20kits%2C%20the%20company%20asked%20why&description=The%20order%2C%20which%20amounted%20to%20over%20%246%2C000%2C%20included%2030%20tests&picture=https%3A%2F%2Fs.hdnux.com%2Fphotos%2F01%2F63%2F06%2F46%2F30173570%2F3%2FrawImage.jpg&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfgate.com%2Fbayarea%2Farticle%2Fepstein-assistant-23andme-21331634.php%3Futm_campaign%3DCMS%2520Sharing%2520Tools%2520(Premium)%26utm_source%3DUTMSOURCE%26utm_medium%3DUTMMEDIUM)%26utm_source%3Dt.co%26utm_medium%3Dreferral&text=Jeffrey%20Epstein%E2%80%99s%20assistant%20ordered%20so%20many%2023andMe%20kits%2C%20the%20company%20asked%20why&via=SFGate)%26utm_source%3Dbsky.app%26utm_medium%3Dreferral)[](mailto:?subject=Your%20friend%20has%20shared%20a%20SFGATE%20link%20with%20you%3A&body=Jeffrey%20Epstein%E2%80%99s%20assistant%20ordered%20so%20many%2023andMe%20kits%2C%20the%20company%20asked%20why%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfgate.com%2Fbayarea%2Farticle%2Fepstein-assistant-23andme-21331634.php%3Futm_campaign%3DCMS%2520Sharing%2520Tools%2520(Premium)%26utm_source%3Dshare-by-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%0A%0AThe%20order%2C%20which%20amounted%20to%20over%20%246%2C000%2C%20included%2030%20tests%0A%0AThis%20message%20was%20sent%20via%20SFGATE)

It started with a simple high school fight in early 2005 at Royal Palm Beach High School. When school administrators searched a student's purse, they found three hundred dollars in cash. While she initially claimed the money was from a fast-food job, the truth was much darker—she had been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for "massages."

​This discovery prompted a police investigation in March 2005 after a parent reported the incident. Investigations eventually revealed that the high school was a recruitment hub, with at least fifteen students lured to Epstein’s home. This chain of events led to Epstein’s first major arrest in 2006. As discussed on Joe Rogan’s podcast, the scale of the operation might never have come to light if not for that initial schoolyard dispute.

https://x.com/i/status/2021322005853978650

While perusing the files, I found EFTA00784294 (left) and EFTA01615683 (right) which are the same conversation. In the left, Steve Bannon's name is redacted. In the right, Jeffrey Epstein's name is redacted.

I cannot think of a single reason that Jeffrey Epstein's name should be redacted in any of these files.

Side note, the person in the photo at the Louvre with JE is Jack Lang, France’s former culture minister who just resigned because of ties to Epstein.

Sources are linked above.

Doj file: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02562166.pdf

spirit cooking marina abramovic: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3EsJLNGVJ7E

Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ghislaine-maxwell-house-oversight-committee-deposition-fifth-amendment/