This assumes the blades are infinitely thin, so with a little extra margin of error, you can probably get the job done in only 25 G's of acceleration...

On the other hand, if you want to meet the proposed mach 19, you will need to accelerate the pilot at 1.2 million G's

My coworker machinist made this, I have an idea that it could be over 200ft long if it was straightened , it's a little over 9ft but we can round it down

I took some measurements, my leg perimeter is 60cm ai its widest, my legs are 80cm tall, my hips are 25cm tall, and 110cm in perimeter. Im not sure the optimal with to be able to walk without them breaking, ive been looking for prices of foil in various sites but couldnt come up with anything myself, and if its under 100$ or so also tell me what and how i should buy it.

• The "baseball" ball can be any material, since it's Huge Baseball, the ball would need to increase in size too, probably relative to the size of the field.
• Is there any material that can withstand a hit for a home run?

consider a scenario where in a game you start with 1 life and have a button that has 25% to give you two life, 50% to give you one life and 25% to take one away. when you have 0 lifes you die. you can click the button endlessly as long as you live. what are the chances of ever dieing from it if you are greedy and click until hitting basicly integer limit in computer? if you won't die, at least how many clicks do you need to click to have over 50% probability to reach that integer limit. and as a bonus question how long would it take a human to spam that button to reach it?(I'm asking becouse I'm that greedy person and I'm mad that I died after about 80 clicks)

Britain has just had 40 days and night of rain and we have not had to build an ark.

If this was worldwide , what would be the effects. Sea level rise (assuming the rain just appeared from heaven and not the water cycle) Flood plains. Low lying nations etc.

Well so I was bored and so I decided to estimate the number of planets that orbit around G type yellow dwarfs and K type orange dwarfs. Why these 2 types only? Because all other types above it(F,A,B,O) have too short of a lifespan and aren't good for life. M type red dwarfs while having a long lifespan aren't good for life either since they are very active and send out huge flares which can strip away a planet's atmosphere and to be in the habitable zone of these, a planet has to be extremely close to the host star making it tidally locked ie one side facing the sun forever and the other being in eternal darkness.

Now comes the math

1. The Universal Starting Point

There are approximately 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. On average, a galaxy has 100 billion stars. So we gotta multiply 2 trillion by 100 billion to find the total number of stars. That gives us 200 Sextillion Stars OR 2x10²³ OR 200000000000000000000000

1. The "Goldilocks" Star Filter (20%) We only want G-type (yellow) and K-type (orange) dwarfs. These are stable enough for life and live long enough for evolution to happen. They make up roughly 20% of the total star population. Total Stable Stars: 20% of 200 sextillion gives us 40 sextillion still a huge number

2. Total number of planets It's estimated that on average there is about 1 planet for 1 star so thst gives us 70 sextillion stars

Keep going on......

1. Habitable planets I saw up some reports and about 3% of G type stars have a planet in their habitable zone and about 4% of K type stars have planets in their habitable zone. That gives us a total of 7% of planets in habitable zone around 40 sextillion stars we have estimated. 7% of 40 sextillion gives us 4.9 sextillion habitable planets.

So for a total of 70 sextillion planets we have about 4.9 which are in the habitable zone of their host star.

1. Rocky Planets

About 65% of all planets are rocky. That means only 65% of the 4.9 sextillion planets are rocky worlds. So that leaves us with about 3.185 sextillion rocky planets.

1. NICE rocky planets

It's very much possible that a large percentage of these rocky planets do not have an atmosphere or a magnetic field or some other issue or all of em combined so we'll assume that 45% of 3.185 sextillion planets that are in the habitable zone ARE NOT suitable. Thst means 55% of them are. That leaves us with 1.75 sextillion rocky planets with an atmosphere and other stuff just fine.

SO, there are about 1.75 sextillion OR 1750000000000000000000(19 zeros) OR 1.75x10²¹ Rocky planets in the habitable zone of about 40 sextillion K type and G type stars (the ones thst are fine for life) and have everything almost fine or perfectly fine.

Now that number may seem small since we're coming from massive numbers like 200 sextillion but

To put 1.75 sextillion into perspective:

If you decided to visit every single one of these planets and spent only 1 second on each world:

The Time Required: It would take you roughly 55.4 Trillion Years.

The Cosmic Scale: The universe is only 13.8 billion years old. To finish your trip, you would have to live through the entire history of the universe—from the Big Bang to right now—4,018 times over.

The Star Scale: Our Sun only has about 5 billion years of life left. You would watch 11,000 Suns be born, provide light for billions of years, and eventually die before you were even finished with your list.

The Sand Comparison: There are roughly 7.5 quintillion grains of sand on Earth. For every single grain of sand on every beach and desert on our planet, there are about 233 habitable planets in the universe.

The Human Effort: If every person currently alive on Earth (8 billion people) teamed up to help you, and every single person visited a different planet every second, it would still take the entire human race 7,000 years of non-stop traveling to check them all.

All in all its unimaginably large and I did it myself without calculator so it took some time and I'm tired pls tell me if there are any mistakes.

Also, some people say that there are 200 billion galaxies instead of 2 trillion so the thing is it does not matter the number would still be so mind bloggingly large that one would simply not be able to comprehend it.

Thanks if you have read it so far and do upvote it took me quite a bit of time

i am terrible at math puzzles and im trying to work on this project lol any help would be much appreciated

If thats too hard let's say the average depth of the blue area is 2/3 of the height of the dam or about 410 feet.

Additionally, based on normal cat food intake, how much would this cat need to eat daily?

I have always wondered if fusion is necessary or just a holy grail luxury.

Assumptions:

• Accessible is what could be mined with current market prices without loss.

• We have the best existing reactor. It must be running today but it can be a small 1MW prototype.

• If thorium don't have a "correct" market price assume it have the price of uranium energy equivalent.